A few days before the murder of 22 people in an El Paso Walmart, there was a story in The Forward, Antisemites Make a List of Jews – and Twitter Stands Up in Solidarity, in which it was reported that white supremacists were targeting Jews on Twitter for harassment by searching for people who openly stated they were Jewish.
Jewish Journal columnist Ariel Sobel [u]rged her thousands of followers to “avoid typing out the phrase ‘I’m Jewish’ on Twitter.” She had discovered that white supremacists were using the phrase “I’m Jewish” to compile a digital archive of Jewish targets.
[A] flood of supporters and well-wishers replied with Tweets including that phrase. Jewish Twitter-users expressed their Jewish pride, and non-Jewish allies posted the phrase in order to confuse and disrupt the white supremacists’ data collection.
It was a heartwarming story of people of all faiths coming together from across the political spectrum to combat online antisemitic hate and extremism.
Except that’s not what happened.
When those who write the history books omit the parts that make them look bad and lie about the rest of the story, the narrative gets twisted and the audience becomes an unknowing and enabling accomplice to the lie.
What does this have to do with the El Paso shooting? Admittedly, it seems like a small, insignificant, and mostly unrelated story except for the white supremacist tie in. This requires some back story.
I grew up in the 80s and 90s. I was told from an early age “the world is a rainbow”, “judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin”, “we’re all the human race”, and I believed it. I believed it so much that I either ignored, accepted, or was oblivious that the feeling wasn’t mutual because I was expected to… or I was a racist. I didn’t know that it was a one way street.
I had been noticing the rampant anti-white bigotry that was sweeping our nation’s institutions over the past few years. Anything white was deemed a pejorative. “White privilege”, “colonialism”, “end whiteness”, the open hatred of white people not being called out as racist but instead excused because “you can’t be racist without power”, diversity (or, less white people) being the greatest achievement, critical race theory – where it’s taught that all whites are racist as a baseline, and any interaction a white person has with a non-white person has to be seen through racism, so no matter what you do, it’s racism (move out = white flight = racism, move in = gentrification = racism, don’t see race = ignoring racism = racism, see race = racism, participate in other culture = cultural appropriation = racism, don’t participate in other culture = racism, ask “can I help you?” = racism, don’t ask “can I help you?” = ignoring = racism).
I watched the college campus videos of professors going on anti-white rants, or dealt with people who wouldn’t allow you to disagree with them without calling you a racist. I heard these anti-white talking points used commonly on mainstream media outlets, TV shows, and movies, that it was suddenly ok to talk this way about white people out in the open. Everything was “racist” and “white supremacist”, down to even having white children.
If someone called you a racist, you were expected to recoil in horror and prove you weren’t, yet no proof was ever enough because you could never rid yourself of your whiteness anyway.
I even saw other white people joining in, saying the most derogatory self-loathing things about themselves but especially about white people in general. None of this made sense to me.
A white kid from the 80s and 90s starts asking himself and those around him, “what the hell did I ever do?” It was expected that white people just accept this for “sins of our past” or to feel shame about ourselves and our ancestors, until I heard someone stand up against the anti-white bigotry. It was an anti anti-white defense, and it was surprising to me because in my near 40 years of life I had never heard anyone ever say something specifically in defense of white people, let alone that white people should even be proud of who they are.
Then someone pointed out something to me that I found disturbing, and my first instinct was to recoil and think the person telling it to me was a “white supremacist”, as I was trained to do my whole life apparently – they told me those who were saying racially derogatory things about their “fellow white people” were Jewish.
This made me uncomfortable, mainly because I instinctively felt you don’t criticize ethnic or religious minorities as a white person, nor did I ever think any criticism had to be made. White people committed all the wrongs in the world, after all.
I’m a “prove it to me” kind of person though, so instead of hearing it only from someone else, I started looking at who would espouse blatantly anti-white rhetoric who were also “white”, and sure enough, every single time they were Jewish. It became a meme of itself: “As a fellow white person, I hate white people. I’m Jewish.” I had never noticed it before, but once you notice, you can’t unnotice. Many, if not most, weren’t just random people; they were journalists, writers, bloggers, commentators, producers, teachers, professors, lawyers, artists, activists, members of prestigious groups, from media, cultural, political, and academic institutions, people of influence in the public discorse, and some were also blue checkmark verified.
And this brings us back to the story of the “evil white supremacists” who were “targeting Jews” for harassment, for no reason at all except for being Jewish, by searching for those who would openly say they were Jewish on Twitter, and everyone rushing to save the poor Jews from the literal Nazis by tweeting “I’m Jewish” to confuse and disrupt the hateful “antisemites”.
What you weren’t told was that first these people were tweeting the most vile and hateful things about white people, and white people who were tired of being trashed for the crime of being white were calling them out for their anti-white bigotry, screenshotting their own tweets and THEN searching their history to see if they were Jewish. A collage of their hate was made, and that’s what was being shared.
Every supportive person who stood in solidarity by tweeting “I’m Jewish” were lied to by omission, and they disrupted nothing because they probably never said anything disparaging about white people first.
These anti-white tweeters who were Jewish weren’t victims; they were the perpetrators. They left out the part of the story that made them look bad, labeled their victims things like “white supremacist”, “white nationalists”, “Nazis”, and “antisemites”, and made themselves out to be the victims for an audience to supply them with empathy and support. It’s classic narcissism. I encourage you to stop reading this article for a minute and read this one called How narcissists play the victim and twist the story. There’s a literal playbook to this particular personality disorder.
But where does that leave the real victims? That’s part of the narcissist’s playbook – leave the victim isolated, smeared, and slandered, all to maintain the narrative and the lie.
Every time more people online would notice and share the anti-white screenshots, they were mass reported and had their accounts suspended. And that’s the common condition for anyone who somebody else labels a “white nationalist white supremacist racist antisemitic literal neo-Nazi” – deplatformed for telling the truth. The victims weren’t “keeping a list of Jews”; they didn’t want the proof of the anti-white bigotry by Jews to be deleted.
Again though, what does any of this have to do with the mass shooting in El Paso?
Just like you were lied to about “white supremacists targeting anyone who said ‘I’m Jewish’ on Twitter”, it is a microcosm of what we’re dealing with here. You are being lied to about who so-called “white nationalists” are. The narrative is being twisted on a much grander scale by media and political narcissists, using a tragedy to isolate, smear, and slander peaceful people with a policy difference who are standing up for themselves.
Nationalists are no more “White Nationalists” than they are Japanese Nationalists. Nationalists believe every country and people should determine their own destiny, free from interference, forced globalism, or mass migration, respecting other nations’ sovereignty and borders, and peacefully existing by other nations. Nationalists believe that while every person is an individual with individual rights, a nation is a reflection of the unique people who inhabit it via a common language, culture, traditions, ethnicity, history, and values.
Nationalists put the interests of their nation and people first before the interests of other nations or people – not in spite of other nations or people, nor to subjugate other nations or people, which is how some people try to conflate nationalists with “supremacists”. Nationalists who happen to be white are not “white supremacists”, just as Nationalists in Japan aren’t Japanese supremacists.
Nationalists care about immigration displacing Americans’ communities, values, language, ethnicity, culture, traditions, ideology, businesses, jobs, influence, representation, and their children’s future. Because a nation is a reflection of its people, if you displace or replace its people, you alter the nation.
Nationalists also care about what immigration to America does to a country like Mexico, where a third of its people are now living here, leaving it to be controlled by narco terrorism. Or what immigration to America does to a country like India, or any other country really, where those most likely and able to make economic, social, and political change to better the lives of their people are siphoned off for America.
While Nationalists may care about the wellbeing of the people of those countries, what people decide to do in their countries is none of our business and not our problem. Being a Nationalist means being a noninterventionist. If the people of another country want liberty or a better life for themselves and their children, they can vote for it or pick up a gun and earn it. What they make for themselves and what path they take as a nation and a people is for them to decide and them alone, just as our Fore Fathers did not spill their own blood so the rest of the world’s people could reap what they had sewn.
Nationalists believe it isn’t America’s responsibility to put our people’s lives on the line to be the police of the world. It also isn’t our responsibility to be the pressure relief valve for the world’s people. America doesn’t belong to the people of other nations who don’t like how their nations are being run, and Americans get to have a nation that we call our own too. It is our birthright.
America is also more than just a global economic zone where being an American is merely seen as a ticket to prosperity that everyone in the world is entitled to, where everyone is an American, they’re just not here yet. America is not cultural tofu – a shapeless colorless tasteless mass that’s awful on its own without the flavors of diversity, molded into whatever shape looks edible but still has to be choked down because America is so awful.
Nationalists are against any people of the world being forcibly displaced from their homeland. It would literally be a federal and an international crime to intentionally destroy or displace, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group. That’s the U.N.’s and America’s own definition of “genocide”.
The United States has been undergoing a massive demographic shift due to the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. Since our Founding up until about 1970, our demographics remained largely unchanged, comprised of nearly 90% Northern and Western European descent. That number is now right around 60%, and in about 20 years, it’ll be under 50%. This is what’s referred to as the “Great Replacement”, which I researched after the ChristChurch attack in my article The Great Replacement: A murderer’s conspiracy theory or international policy.
This was not a naturally occurring phenomenon where one or more groups simply outpace another. It was a specific policy put in place that is displacing, in part and in some areas of the country in whole, a national, ethnical, and racial group through mass immigration. Mass migration is outpacing white reproduction by nearly four to one, per year. The fact that white people would need to be in a breeding contest to remain a majority in the country their ancestor’s founded is proof enough that genocidal policies are in place.
Because the group being displaced is “white people” though, white being the pejorative, Nationalists are called “white supremacists”, “white nationalists”, and “racists” for wanting this to stop through a change in policy.
“White Nationalist” is meant to be a slur, but some Nationalists in western and European countries have adopted it the way homosexuals adopted “queer”; they feel like they have nothing to be ashamed of for being white or for loving and supporting their people and children. They’re secure enough in their identity to tell people who are anti-white to shove it, and this is spun by the narcissists as bigotry.
Nationalism is a non violent ideology – Nationalists simply want to be left alone in peace in the lands our ancestors shed their blood throwing off tyranny to earn for themselves and their children. But those opposed to national sovereignty, in both major parties, the media, business, and finance, have no desire to allow our voices to be heard.
Don’t kid yourselves, voters who consider yourselves Republicans: the GOP is as globalist as the Democrats. Democrats support displacing Americans with amnesty for the tens of millions of illegal aliens here plus the +1M legal immigrants coming annually, and Trump and the Republicans support displacing Americans “as long as it’s done legally” by increasing the amount of legal immigration from what it is now. Libertarians want open borders. The Marxist group Democratic Socialists of America wants open borders. This is what’s known as the “controlled opposition”; there’s no alternative offered to being displaced, except by Nationalists.
But the public never gets to hear the Nationalist message or their side of the story. Even at the congressional hearing on “white nationalism” after ChristChurch, those they labeled “white nationalists” weren’t allowed to appear. The only person who stood up against the anti-white bigotry was Candace Owens – who was then basically labeled a token “white nationalist” for the crime of not hating white people who love the country their ancestors founded. The absurdity makes you feel like you’re the crazy person, which is why you hear the term “Clown World” thrown around in our circle so much.
There is nothing violent about a Nationalist’s ideology. Nationalists support policy changes, not violence.
• Repeal the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965
• A moratorium on immigration and naturalization, and permanent residency/work visas
• Deportation of illegal aliens and those who overstay their visas
• Define via legislation or regulation the 14th Amendment’s “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” to exclude children of non-citizens, unnaturalized immigrants, illegal aliens, tourists, or foreign nationals so that only children born of a U.S. citizen can be a citizen, or ratify a new Constitutional Amendment defining citizenship and delegating broad authority over immigration to congress
• Prohibit remittance
• End all foreign aid
• End the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), no wars without formal declaration by Congress, as mandated by the Constitution
• Draw down troops, close overseas bases
• Only use military to defend against attack or invasion
Debt (public and private)
• Abolish the Federal Reserve, the privately owned international central banking system and issuer of our perpetual debt-based currency
• Establish interest free public currency backed by either labor, goods, gold, etc
• Prohibit unsecured debt such as credit cards*
• Prohibit student loans*
• Prohibit/phase out usury* for secured debt (homes, etc)
*Minimum payments on maximum obtainable debt artificially inflates the value/cost of every commodity (most notably homes and college tuition), whereby requiring perpetual debt to participate in the free market.
Domestic policy varies within Nationalist circles, as it should because that’s the point of Nationalism – we debate and decide what direction we go as a nation and a people. But here are some that are thrown around:
• Enact policies that encourage young families (such as subsidized 4 year college tuition for married parent(s) after 3+ children reach pre-school age)
• End perpetual property taxes so people can own their homes/land instead of paying the government rent, one time property tax at point of purchase (property tax refund after married couple had 3+ children)
• Harsher penalties and longer prison sentences for victimizers, State/Federal “3 strikes law” for serial victimizers
None of these policy preferences call for violence or murder. Is it possible for a Nationalist to pop off? No more than a Bernie supporter who attempted to execute a mass political assassination against Congressional Republicans at a baseball game. Or an African migrant who tried to burn over 50 Italian school children alive on a bus because Italy wouldn’t open its border to more migrants and refugees.
And none of those actions are excusable, yet you don’t have the entire media and political establishment condemning everyone who brushed up against Bernie or refugees as people who need to be wiped from the face of the earth. If you aren’t violent, nor call for violence or for others to be violent, it is unconscionable for you or an entire ideology to be labeled as violent, and you have nothing to apologize for.
Nationalists, however, are specifically excluded from the public debate, because the narcissists in the media and politics have already told you what they say Nationalists are. And as with all narcissists, they lie, they believe their own lie, they can never be wrong or admit that they’re wrong, and they have to keep repeating the lie to others until they triangulate their audience to turn against you.
Are Nationalists angry? I don’t think anger best describes it. Betrayed and righteously indignant better suits the mood. When you’re systematically targeted for your beliefs (or when beliefs are attributed to you that you don’t believe), to be lied about, to be smeared for calling out the actions of others so the truth is buried, to be doxxed and harassed, to have the “Two Minutes Hate” directed at you and your family, to have your job or livelihood threatened or taken from you, to be removed from the social media public square or be deemed too dangerous to have your views shared, to be denied access to payment processing services, to be violently attacked and have the attackers’ violence excused or condoned, to have the SPLC or ADL designate you a member of a hate group, to vote for someone who tells you they support your policies only to throw you under the bus, to have every institution of power that benefits off the current system unified in opposition against you, to be isolated and marginalized as you watch your nation and people dissolve before your eyes… that “anger” is pointed at by the narcissists as proof of your “instability”. And you wonder why a couple Nationalists have popped off.
This isn’t about “white nationalist” hatred for others; this is about our response to the hatred directed toward white people and our nation first. Because this country was founded by white people who wanted to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity”, those who hate white people believe this country is illegitimate, and want to eat away at and tear down every foundational block it stands on. When we as Americans are opposed to their subversive efforts to undermine our country through perversion, perpetual debt, forced globalism, and mass migration to “diversify” a country they believe is “too white”, we’re deemed the “racist” enemy who must be destroyed.
This is one Nationalist’s “manifesto”. It’s non violent, it’s rational, and it deserves to be heard without lies, slander, or violence.
And remember, the next time you hear someone call someone else a “white supremacist”, another unmistakable personality trait of a narcissist is projection.