I am not a lawyer, but I enjoy reading law and court decisions (we all have our quirky hobbies, don’t judge me). While wading through the muck and the mud that are the recent anti gun bills passed by the California legisexuals, one in particular stood out to me in a very eerie and ominous way.

Let me bring your attention to AB 2607, otherwise known as changes and additions to the “Firearm Restraining Order”. Originally, this law was passed after that sex crazed virgin in Santa Barbara stabbed three people to death and shot three more with guns he bought under our currently overburdensome system of gun control laws. It gave family members the ability to quickly have your guns and gun rights stripped without due process if they believed you to be a danger to yourself or others. Nothing about the knife he used to kill three people, but let’s not let that prevent a good legislative session.

What AB 2607 does is it broadens who gets to deem you a danger to yourself or others by adding your employer, coworkers, mental health workers, and “an employee of a secondary or post secondary school that the person has attended in the last 6 months”. It allows your anti gun college professor (or given the text it can also be the janitor or cafeteria worker) to seek out a restraining order against you for what they perceive as a danger to others. Here’s a few professors who might think this is a great idea.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/04/24/anti-gun-professor-wrestles-over-whether-to-write-reference-for-pro-gun-student.html
http://www.grandforksherald.com/opinion/letters/3990525-letter-military-maneuvers-startle-already-stressed-und-campus
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/10/a-serious-offense-professor-under-investigation-for-allegedly-forcing-students-to-make-anti-gun-posters/

If that weren’t frightening enough, the actual text of the bill is what stood out to me. If you don’t know how laws work, if there are changes to the current Penal Code, they’ll cross out sections of the current code which will no longer have any meaning once the changes take place.

Take a look at what AB 2607 decides to draw a line through on page 2:

http://leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_2601-2650/ab_2607_bill_20160317_amended_asm_v98.pdf

For those unwilling or unable to click on the link and read, the legisexuals crossed out the following:

“Existing law, as set forth in the Constitution of the United States and the California Constitution, establishes certain fundamental personal rights, including, among others, the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable seizures and searches, the right to equal protection of the laws, the right to due process of law before being deprived of life, liberty, or property, the right to a trial by a jury, and the right of a defendant in a criminal case to a speedy public trial. This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would ensure that California’s public safety system is fair and just.”

If any of that sounds familiar, it’s because it’s an affirmation of our rights guaranteed by the 4th and 5th Amendments of the Constitution. They, the legisexuals (politicians who enjoy effing the citizenry), literally drew a line through the 4th and 5th Amendments when they rammed this law down the throats and up the asses of the citizenry.

It doesn’t get much more brazenly tyrannical than that, does it?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s